So, The Wall has been breached. Not by a wily opposition, but by five wise men who were once rather eloquently described by Mohinder Amarnath as "a bunch of jokers".
Not that Rahul Dravid, one of only six international cricketers to have scored more than 10,000 one-day runs, would find anything remotely funny in the recent turn of events that finds him out of the Indian cricket side after just one poor series -- that, too, against the world's best cricket team.
For the past couple of seasons, Dravid has increasingly played as the floater in the Indian one-day batting line up. While Sachin Tendulkar and Sourav Ganguly have both clearly stated their preference to open the innings, Dravid had taken upon himself the tough role of a finisher.
During the last series against Australia, it appeared that the new Indian skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni preferred the hardhitting Robin Uthappa as the side's designated finisher. For the first time in a long and distinguished career, Dravid looked out of sorts in a line up that had the senior pros Tendulkar and Ganguly as openers, the prolific Yuvraj Singh as the new middle-order pivot and Dhoni and Uthappa as finishers.
If such a line up is the blueprint for future, with Ganguly making way for a young tyro somewhere along the future, then there is nothing wrong in axing Dravid. As long as someone in the Indian cricket board had the courtesy to explain in advance to Dravid, the reasons behind his non-selection.
If the dropping, or resting if you may please, of India's most reliable batsman, has anything to do with one bad series against the Australians (and I suspect it being a case of the latter rather than the former) then it is just another sad example of the knee-jerk reaction of a selection comittee that appears even more confused than its predecessor.
The Chairman of selectors, Dilip Vengsarkar not for the first time contradicted himself when he first said that Dravid has been "rested" for the first two one-dayers against Pakistan and then said the senior pro would have to prove his "form and fitness" if he hoped to come back to the Indian team.
Dravid has never been known to be fleet of foot on the field, but he is perhaps India's best slips fielder in both Tests (along with VVS Laxman) and one-dayers. It is difficult to imagine how his agility on the field or his catching in a four-day match for Karnataka is going to help him to return to the Indian one-day side.
If Dravid's ouster from the side raised a few eyebrows, then the decision to bring back Virender Sehwag, not by a long shot in prime form, baffled even more people.
Sehwag was up and down during the Twenty20 World Cup and then again in the recently concluded Challenger series. Every solid performance was followed by a failure, not exactly the sign of a man in form. Having said that, he is just one innings away from his best form is a cricketing adage that fits no one better than Sehwag.
Sehwag's inclusion makes sense only if you are ready to view him as a batting allrounder and utilize the offspin bowling option that he provides. If the Indian team management decide to go in with four specialist bowling options, plus Sehwag, then it does allow the side to play an additional specialist batsman -- either Gautam Gambhir or Rohit Sharma.
Many moons ago, Sourav Ganguly had come up with the inspired decision to ask Dravid to keep wickets. In the bargain, India had got a world class batsman at the number seven slot. In case, Sehwag is groomed as a batting allrounder, it would allow the Indian side to take the field with additional batting firepower.
My ideal eleven for the first one-dayer against Pakistan would be : Sachin Tendulkar, Sourav Ganguly, Virender Sehwag, Gautam Gambhir, Yuvraj Singh, Mahendra Singh Dhoni, Robin Uthappa, Irfan Pathan, Murali Karthik, Zaheer Khan and S Sreesanth.
Though I daresay the Indian management would play safe and go in with five specialist bowlers. In place of Gautam Gambhir, Harbhajan Singh would come in. Gambhir is in the form of his life (and you can't say the same about Bhajji) and it would be a pity if he was confined to the dressing room. It is difficult to imagine though that the selectors would select Sehwag and not play him in the eleven.
Given the fact that Pakistan is arriving with their first-choice bowling attack -- Shoaib Akhtar, Mohammad Asif and Umar Gul -- in a long long time, it remains to be seen how the Indian selectors go about their job, not just in the first two matches, but during the rest of the series as well.
As India look for a winning combination that would serve the side well, leading up to the next World Cup, Dhoni and Co could experiment with Irfan Pathan as a new ball bowler. In his heydays Pathan used to be a handful with the new white ball.
Now that Pathan is once again back in the side as a regular, Dhoni could toss the new ball to the erstwhile Sultan of Swing and see whether he can still bring the new white ball back into right handed batsmen with the same devastating effect.
Also in the Indian squad are the young Mumbai middle order bat Rohit Sharma who made such an impressive debut in the Twenty20 World Cup, and rookie all-rounder Praveen Kumar. The tall, well built Kumar is nowhere near express but can be quite nippy on his day and has a happy knack of picking wickets, as he showed during the recently-concluded Challenger Series.
Add to that his ability to wield the long handle, one is not surprised why the selectors, despairing the lack of all-rounders,have so promptly drafted him into the squad. It, however, remains to be seen if Kumar has the ability to deliver the goods at the highest level, or more importantly whether he would even get the opportunity to display his skills.